Watch Unlawfull Killing - Princess Diana Murder in Channels | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Unlawful Killing- Diana, Princess of Wales
500 years ago there lived a king who first divorced, and later had two wives executed on his order, enabling him to marry again later on. Circumstances have changed somewhat in terms of what today would be considered a scandal for a now tarnished royalty, leading nevertheless to a similar end for the estranged wife of a modern-day prince. Of course, even with the approval of the current monarch, things have changed quite a bit since those times, with the inability to order executions by royal edict - officially anyway. But that seems to be a minor encumbrance, easily overcome when one enjoys the sworn loyalty of a spy agency like MI6. Of course, when the desire to pursue a second wife (without blow-back to the royal house) is accompanied by the discovery (via monitored phone calls) that the mother of your royal heirs is not only 2-3 months pregnant, but is making plans to marry again (to a Muslim - no less) then plans already in train must be brought forward.
This is the concealed story of how true royalty (in spirit if not in blood) met her end. The people's princess was disposed of 14 years ago, but will be remembered long after those who signed off on her death warrant pass away and are forgotten by future generations. In order to cover up this shameful execution, both the pre- and post-planning were organized with the type of precision that only a powerful state agency with a very long reach is capable of. First, the 'accident' had to take place on foreign soil, so that those responsible could avoid being summoned for questioning and testimony.
Next the cooperation of the counterpart agency had to be obtained to facilitate all of the following in a foreign land: every single one of the traffic cameras (always on 24-hours) along the route were either switched off or turned inward; the original car to be used conveniently wouldn't start, forcing use of an alternate (almost certainly rigged beforehand with 'Boston Brakes' - see articles below); the seatbelt on her usual side was later found to be jammed in the retracted position (it was well known that she habitually strapped in); the purported blood sample from the chauffeur showing him to be intoxicated was never DNA-verified and is now believed to have come from a recent suicide victim; The princess herself was hurriedly embalmed in defiance of local laws - a procedure that entails draining the body of blood, thereby ensuring that proof of her pregnancy could never be verified.
Finally, almost as if a voice from the grave, we find letters from the deceased warning earlier on that her life was in danger from her powerful ex-husband and that it would be as a result of a tampered-brakes car crash. One such letter had been lodged with the police back home who refused to release it to the overseas court. Since that time, suspicious deaths of several individuals closely associated with the case have occurred and the stand-in chauffeur that night has since been found to be on the payroll of the local 'intelligence' agency.
14 years after her death, new evidence has emerged that Diana was murdered by MI6 ‘Boston brakes’...
Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s InquiryBy Jon KingThe ‘Boston Brakes’Fourteen years after her death, new evidence has emerged that Princess Diana was murdered in an MI6-organized ‘Boston brakes’ operation.Following the 2008 Royal Inquest debacle, which ruled out MI6 involvement in Diana’s death, new evidence has come to light which challenges the ‘official verdict’.In their book, Princess Diana: The Evidence, authors Jon King and John Beveridge present evidence that a highly sophisticated assassination technique was used to cause the princess’s vehicle to crash as it drove through the Alma tunnel, Paris, in the early hours of August 31st, 1997.The ‘Boston brakes’, they reveal, is the most favoured assassination technique employed by the West’s intelligence services due to its deniability.For many years following the princess’s death, the authors delved the smoke-and-mirrors underworld of political assassination, gleaning what information they could from well-placed intelligence contacts and former special and elite forces—mercenaries, royal bodyguards, and on ocassion, hired assassins.Some of these crack military freelancers disclosed details of prior operations in which the ‘Boston brakes’ had been successfully used. Others, who fought in Angola, home of Diana’s landmines campaign, threw light on the secret oil and diamond wars still raging in central Africa, and in particular the dirty arms-for-oil deals carried out by MI6, French DGSE, the CIA and the Bush-Cheney oil syndicate.The authors were told that by focusing the light of the world’s media on Angola the princess was in danger of exposing these deals, and was thus placing herself “in grave danger”.For obvious reasons some of the sources quoted in the book remain anonymous. But many are named.
Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s InquiryThe SAS And The ClinicSpeaking of the ‘Boston brakes’ operation which he believed killed Princess Diana, former SAS sergeant, Dave Cornish, exclusively revealed:“From the minute the decoy car left the Ritz to the moment the tail car closed in … it was obvious what was going down. Anyone who knows what they’re talking about’ll tell you the same.”And former Royal bodyguard, Mike Grey, added:“The operation bore all the classic hallmarks of a security service assassination …. I have no doubts whatsoever, given my twenty years experience in various sections of the security industry, that Diana was assassinated. The security service hallmarks are plain to see.”But it was former SAS officer and world-famous explorer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes, who offered perhaps the most telling revelation of all.The ‘Boston brakes’ method of assassination, Fiennes reveals, has been in use since at least the 1980s, and deploys a microchip transceiver which takes over the target vehicle’s steering and brakes at the critical moment.The method, he says, was first deployed by the CIA in Boston, hence the name. But it has since been adopted by intelligence and security forces the world over, as well as by private security firms and their hit squads.Fiennes also confirms that the death by ‘road traffic accident’ of SAS Major Michael Marman in England in 1986 was the result of a Boston brakes operation carried out by a private hit squad known as The Clinic.
Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s InquiryThe Attempt To Assassinate CamillaFurther instances of the Boston brakes in action are also cited in the book, including the death by ‘road traffic accident’ of Diana’s former lover and bodyguard, Barry Mannakee, in 1987, and – staggeringly – the attempted assassination by ‘road traffic accident’ of Camilla Parker Bowles just two months prior to Diana’s own fatal crash.The story of this never-before-disclosed incident is recounted in some detail in the book.According to sources quoted by the authors, the attempt on Camilla Parker Bowles’s life was the result of a “constitutional crisis” engendered by Prince Charles’s desire to marry his long-term lover while Diana was still alive.Indeed, according to Tony Wright, then parliamentary aide to the Lord Chancellor, the crisis was so severe it almost resulted in the disestablishment of the Church The Independent.As the authors point out, such a move would have amounted to the biggest, most far-reaching constitutional reforms since Henry VIII. And we all know what happened to one or two of his wives…
Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s InquirySeat Belt “Jammed In The Retracted Position”Other revelations in the book include an interview with a well-known Harley Street specialist [named in the book] who became Diana’s nutritional guru.Fearing she might have been pregnant, the authors reveal, Diana visited her nutritional guru for dietary advice prior to her final holiday with Dodi Fayed. Following her visit the specialist’s Harley Street clinic was broken into and his computer stolen.And there are many other fresh concerns raised in this uncompromising cross-examination of the ‘accident theory’, in which the authors assume the roles of prosecuting counsels in what is in effect a ‘people’s inquiry’.Not least among these concerns is the anomaly surrounding Diana’s seat-belt, which, the authors reveal, was found by the Operation Paget team to have been “jammed in the retracted position” and thus unusable—a fact, like so many others, brushed aside by the Royal Inquest.Other challenges to the ‘accident theory’ include:
- Grave concerns over the coroner’s decision to ignore crucial evidence regarding landmines;
- The true identity of certain members of the paparazzi;
- The Metropolitan Police cover-up of Diana’s recorded statements about perceived threats on her life;
- Recorded communications between Diana, Prince Charles and Prince Philip;
- Concerns about Diana’s illegal embalming, which the authors discover was carried out on the orders of a very high-ranking British ‘diplomat’ stationed at the British Embassy in Paris on the night of the crash [diplomat named in the book];
- The ‘bullet hole’ found in paparazzo James Andanson’s head, discovered and reported by Police Chief Jean-Michel Lauzun at the scene of the MI6 agent’s mysterious ‘suicide’;
- And Henri Paul’s spurious blood sample – on which the inquest’s verdict was ultimately based – which, the authors reveal, was never DNA-identified, was taken from a vial labelled ‘unknown male’ and contained a level of carbon monoxide so excessive six of the world’s most eminent forensic experts stated under oath that it could not possibly have belonged to Henri Paul.
Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s InquiryAlso In ‘Princess Diana – The Evidence’
- An unforgiving exposé on the “wholly flawed and contrived” Royal Inquest;
- A comprehensive, 60,000-word critique of Lord Stevens’ Operation Paget investigation;
- An extensive dossier on the mismanagement of the French Inquiry;
- Plus compelling evidence of a plot to assassinate Diana dating back to November 1995.Incredibly, Princess Diana: The Evidence also reveals foreknowledge of a prime-target assassination being planned by MI6 one week prior to Diana’s fatal crash.The authors are calling for a ‘People’s Inquiry’ to be launched into the incident.Little wonder this book is billed as ‘The Book the British Government Tried To Ban!’● ● ●
- See also: William Suspects Conspiracy, Dodi Fayed’s Father Claims
- See also: Diana Inquest – The Documents The Jury Never Saw
- See also: Princess Diana Assassination – 14 Years Of Lies Spies And Cover-Ups
- See also: Princess Diana And Jorg Haider Assassinated By ‘Boston Brakes’
- See also: Princess Diana Forum Topic
- See also: Princess Diana And MI6
- See also: Political Assassinations
French authorities may seek an international arrest warrant for two former police chiefs, who withheld a prophetic note in which Princess Diana seemingly predicted her assassination by car crash. Something she stated on more than one occasion.
Former Scotland Yard chief Lord Condon and former Assistant Commissioner of Specialist Operations Sir David Veness, have been ordered to attend an interview in Paris to address why the note was under lock and key for 3 years following Diana’s death. If they fail to attend they will be treated as suspects. The note remained hidden even when Lord Condon’s successor Lord Stevens took over as Metropolitan Police Commissioner, suggesting the orders may have came from a higher authority.
The note was handed to the MET by Diana’s Lawyer Lord Mishcon shortly after the 1997 Paris tunnel crash, which also claimed the lives of Diana’s boyfriend Dodi Fayed and driver Henri Paul. It drew on a meeting between Diana and the law firm where she claimed her life was in danger; the record of the meeting in the form of a hand-written note says efforts would be made to get rid of her “…be it by some accident in her car such as pre-prepared brake failure or whatever.”
Lord Condon and Sir Veness have publicly claimed that they made the decision not to release the document unless there was a suggestion that the crash was not an accident , but the French Judge Gerard Caddeo may see this as withholding the very evidence that does suggest it wasn’t an accident. Under French law, “removing or concealing” evidence, which could “facilitate the discovery of a crime”, is punishable by three to five years in jail or a fine.
Coinciding with the release of controversial Keith Allen documentary “Unlawful Killing” that suggests Diana was assassinated, this re-ignition of the case may open a whole new can of worms, right when the British establishment is being rocked by the phone hacking scandal.
It should be noted that this isn’t the only document where Diana’s death appears to be foreshadowed. As reported by The Telegraph another document was written way back in 1993!
A handwritten letter in which Diana, Princess of Wales claimed that the Prince of Wales was plotting to kill her so he could marry Tiggy Legge-Bourke, the former nanny to Princes William and Harry, has been shown at the inquest into her death.
That letter reads:
“This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous – my husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry Tiggy. Camilla is nothing but a decoy, so we are all being used by the man in every sense of the word.”
Even the most non-conspiratorial minded person has to scratch their head with intrigue that Diana feared for her death by orchestrated car crash as early as 1993, and then wound up dead in a car crash, while one of the notes that predicted this was subsequently hidden by police officers honored by the Queen, whose oh so Royal family would be prime suspects in an assassination of the Princess.
So far the official story is that the Mercedes-Benz carrying the victims collided with the 13th pillar of the Pont de l’Alma tunnel, because driver Henri-Paul was intoxicated with alcohol, anti-depressants and possibly carbon monoxide, causing him to lose control of the wheel. However video surveillance at the hotel that evening show an upright Paul who appears to be in full control of his faculties. Moments before entering the vehicle he can be seen quite happily tying his shoe laces with no obvious impairment.
The media frenzy that called Henri “drunk as a pig” , was well underway before samples had even been presented , suggesting the narrative was to some degree pre-arranged or grossly speculative. Independent forensic pathologists have reviewed the toxicology reports and concluded that the blood samples were not stored at the correct temperatures, meaning higher levels of alcohol would have been recorded due to decomposition of the blood. Furthermore it was claimed that Henri-Paul had over 20% carbon monoxide blood content, which would cause any regular person severe head-aches and a lack of coordination, which again is refuted by the CCTV evidence of Paul in the hotel lobby. No acceptable explanation has been given for the presence of Carbon Monoxide. Initial reports claim it came from the vehicles airbags, but this was later ruled out. It seems absurd that a life saving system could release a toxic gas. It quite logically has been suggested that this intoxication came post-crash from exhaust fumes, but Henri was supposed to have died on impact rendering him unable to breath in any of the fumes. Smoking was also blamed, but Toxicologist Professor Robert Forrest ultimately had to concede that “It’s either conspiracy or cock-up.” “…he could not find any logical explanation for the findings.” A thorough investigation needs to follow all leads and motives. The Henri-Paul claim is flimsy, so it would be worth following up on Diana’s cries for help, specifically the idea that she was to be murdered by “pre-prepared brake failure”. Such a technique for carrying out assassinations does purportedly exist within the secret services of the world. According to author Jon King it’s called the “Boston Breaks” method and involves installing hardware within a vehicle, which allows the assassination team to jam the steering column and braking functions remotely, causing the car to hurtle out of control, unable to break or steer. This is dealt with in his book Diana: The Evidence Also in the book The Feathermen by former SAS demolition expert and famous British explorer Sir Ranulph Fiennes, he recounts the alleged assassination of Major Michael Marman via this very method.
The Clinic had been watching Major Michael Marman, and had determined that he frequently drove along the A303 arterial road, in Wiltshire, south-west England, on personal business. While doing this, he was habitually alone, and the fact that his vehicle was a relatively flimsy Citroen 2CV meant that a crash was the perfect method to kill him. Nevertheless, the Clinic dared not tamper with Marman’s car or deploy a driver to ram him off the road, since their contractual obligation to make the death appear accidental would almost certainly come unstuck under the slightest police investigation. They therefore decided to use a proxy: an apparently random driver who would unknowingly become the Clinic’s untraceable instrument of execution, by colliding with Marman. Through relatively simple research, they discovered a businessman whose offices were in Plymouth and London, and who regularly drove between the two along the A303 road. This was Air Marshal (ret’d) Sir Peter Horsley, former equerry to the Duke of Edinburgh and to the Queen, and ex-Commander in Chief of Britain’s atomic strike force, who now worked for an engineering firm, ML Holdings. Study and surveillance showed that Sir Peter was due to drive from London to Plymouth for a board meeting on 11 November 1986, at a time which would mean he would pass Major Marman in the opposite direction along the length of the A303. The Clinic then entered Horsely’s garage during the night of 10-11 November, and, over an eight-hour period, fitted a ‘parasite’ braking system in the cavities of his BMW, in such a way that it couldn’t be seen on immediate inspection. This radio-controlled system was powered by a scuba-diving cylinder of compressed air, which would allow each of the car’s brakes to be applied separately, without the control of the driver. The next day, having practised their technique for weeks with stock cars and models, two of the Clinic members shadowed Horsely, while keeping in radio communication with a second Clinic team, shadowing Marman. As Marman’s 2CV and Horsely’s BMW approached each other along the A303, the parasite braking system was applied, and Horsely lost control of his vehicle, which was steered across the central reservation and into Marman’s path. the ensuing collision killed Marman outright, and severely injured Horsely. Horsely was initially under suspicion of reckless driving, but fortunately had a witness who had been driving behind him, who testified that he had seen a puff of smoke emerge from the rear of Horsely’s car immediately before he lost control: at inquest, the local coroner said the accident would remain unexplained. The more definitely so, since the Clinic’s parasite brake-system had been secretly removed after the accident while the BMW was impounded at the police garage facility. The Feather Men, who failed to prevent this assassination, ultimately learned exactly how this scenario unfolded when they captured and interrogated the Clinic’s chief assassin.In his autobiography, Sounds From Another Room, Horsley says that he was accelerating to about 60 miles an hour when the car began to react strangely. He saw a grey Volvo closing up quickly behind him and as he was about to wave it past, his BMW spun sharply to the left, the brakes screeching, and then sharply to the right and back again. This is remarkably similar to what happened to the Mercedes before it struck the pillar. Horsley wrote: “Out of the corner of my eye I saw the grey Volvo accelerating past me at high speed. My car had now developed a mind of its own as it swung broadside and skidded down the road. With a lurch it hit the central reservation, mounted the grass verge separating the two lanes of the highway and crossed over into the opposite carriageway. I had just time to see a small car approaching from the opposite direction. I hit it sideways on with tremendous force. In a split-second the driver’s horror-stricken face was visible and I heard his hoarse scream.” It’s worth noting the Mercedes carrying Diana had previously been stolen. The Daily Mail notes: It had been stolen several months before the accident and there are those who speculate that this might have been an opportunity to tamper with the car. The general public are familiar with Prince Charles’ affair with Camilla, but Diana’s 1993 letter claims he wanted her dead to pursue a marriage with Tiggy Legge-Bourke (the Prince’s nanny), not Camilla. In fact Camilla herself nearly died in a car accident shortly before Diana’s death , and as the letter states: “Camilla is nothing more than a decoy.” Lets suppose the massive coincidences here are simply that, coincidences, and Diana’s death was just a tragic accident. We still have two documents where Diana feared for her death via car crash. Did Charles and/or the perpetrators strike it lucky; did fate deliver a dead Diana in the exact manner they wanted? Or are we just being silly conspiracy theorists? If that’s the case, the alternative is to believe that Diana was a lying bitch….