November 07, 2012

Ron Paul's Revenge: Four More Years For '44'

Lew Rockwell: No Choice Between 2 Warmongering Puppets 
State Obama Votes Romney Votes Romney Loss Margin Paul Primary Votes Electoral Votes
Connecticut 128,251 120,637 7,614 8,032 7
Florida 4,141,618 4,094,952 46,666 117,461 29
New Hampshire 366,089 325,668 40,421 56,872 4
Ohio 2,691,861 2,584,620 107,241 113,256 18
Virginia 1,868,191 1,767,692 100,499 107,451 13

Today the world awoke to the reality that there will be no 45th president to be sworn in this January! While those who closely tracked the contest anticipated the rout, it must have been a rude awakening for all who bought into a mainstream-hyped close race - confusing national polls with electoral votes. Though obscured by two elections early this century that subverted the will of the electorate to instal the choice of those who operate behind the scenes, the relentless demographic shift marches on. Faced with a choice between two parties which, despite vain protestations to the contrary, both favor intervention by big government in the minutest details of our lives, there is now a clear shift towards the one that demonstrates a more humane approach to welfare, immigration, and never-ending wars!

Meanwhile, the party of Lincoln and of ending slavery is now increasingly disconnected from reality! Today an unholy alliance between big business and religion, they are increasingly seen as apologists for corporate bail-outs and laws favoring big business - seeking to impose their code of moral values. The party that once claimed a philosophy of less government and of keeping the State out of our lives strayed so far from its moorings that its preeminent non-interventionist, Ron Paul became a stranger within his own party, jeered, ridiculed and sidelined by the hierarchy, treated as if he were a nutcase. Managing to win 6 States including Iowa which was credited late, depriving him of early momentum, he was denied the right to a floor vote - his supporters threatened & coerced to support the nominee!

In the end, such heavy-handed abuse cost the challenger dearly, as loyal Paul supporters stayed away or voted for the Libertarian party as the incumbent won the key battleground States by a slim margin! The blame game that usually attends such a profound loss against a reviled administration, including the loss of key Senate seats due to public gaffes by Tea-party candidates will be interesting to watch. My own view is that a party with a shrinking demographic base cannot survive the challenges ahead!

When the dust finally settles, we are likely to see a sole remaining superpower in American politics! As times get more difficult, this will likely be the one that promises more largesse from a smaller pie. Big business and moral-busybody religion are both in for a rough ride and may be dumped by a State that grows more powerful and less tolerant of dissenting voices and seeks to entrench its own power. When it does come, the disintegration of the Grand Old Party will be swift and stunning in its speed!

The awesome power of the State has already risen to frightening levels and will only become worse! Humanity is now headed down a road that will see absolute power concentrated in the hands of a few. The irony is that most continue to see the State as a savior and place even greater faith in its power!

An informed, rather than naive, view of politics is eloquently put forth in the excellent article below! Much human suffering lies in our future before mankind awakens to the fallacy of reposing our trust in others to save us from every peril under the Sun. On that day, all will see the Emperor's nakedness!

Messy Mondays: I Pledge Blind Allegiance

My View of Politics

Recently by Laurence M. Vance: And Your Point Is?

Please remove me from your mailing list, "I’m just totally uninterested in your view of politics," wrote a former student and friend.
I have been described (and dismissed) by some of my former friends as anti-war, libertarian, isolationist, or anti-government, not so much because they think that one word encapsulates my political philosophy, but because they are ignorant of U.S. history, the U.S. military, the U.S. government, U.S. foreign policy, and their own Bible that they profess to believe.
Although I am a student of, and a commentator on, politics, I am not political in any way. I don’t vote. I don’t donate to political campaigns. I don’t endorse candidates. I don’t campaign for anyone. I don’t frequent political events. I don’t watch political debates. I loathe politicians, and especially members of Congress, of whom Mark Twain said: "There is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress."
But what’s not to like about my "view of politics"? What could possibly be so bad about it? And what is my "view of politics" that some conservatives, evangelicals, and Red-State Christian fascists find so uninteresting?
I have assembled this brief explanation of my "view of politics." I am using the word politics in its broadest sense, as is common. Some of my views are best explained by quotes from others that I like. Not in any particular order, here are twelve propositions that make up my "view of politics."
On the state, I believe with Lew Rockwell that the state is "a gang with a flag." I believe with Murray Rothbard that the state is "a bandit gang writ large." It is "a vast criminal organization far more formidable and successful than any ‘private’ Mafia in history." I agree with H. L. Mencken that "every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under" and that "all government is, in its essence, organized exploitation, and in virtually all of its existing forms it is the implacable enemy of every industrious and well-disposed man." I also agree with Voltaire that "the art of government is to make two-thirds of a nation pay all it possibly can pay for the benefit of the other third."

On economics, I believe that laissez faire is natural, moral, and biblical. I oppose all government regulations and any government intervention in the economy for any reason. I also subscribe to Richman’s law: "No matter how much the government controls the economic system, any problem will be blamed on whatever small zone of freedom that remains."
On taxes, I believe that taxation is theft. I believe with Frank Chodorov that the income tax is the root of all evil. But as long as we have taxes, I believe with J. B. Say that the "best" tax is the lightest. I therefore subscribe to the Rockwell rule when it comes to any tax reform proposal: "Does it reduce or eliminate an existing tax?" And I believe that tax breaks, tax shelters, tax incentives, tax deductions, tax loopholes, tax exemptions, and tax credits are always good because they allow people to keep more of their money in their pocket and out of the hands of the government.
On the Democratic Party, I believe with Strom Thurmond, who left the Democratic Party in 1964 because it was "leading the evolution of our nation to a socialistic dictatorship." The Democratic Party is the party of liberalism, socialism, feminism, collectivism, abortion, organized labor, big government, environmentalism, affirmative action, welfare, paternalism, taxing and spending, income redistribution, and every alternative lifestyle known to man. That is, the Democratic Party stands for everything I oppose. I think the last good Democratic president was Grover Cleveland.
On the Republican Party, I don’t think it is the lesser of two evils; I think it is pure evil. When Republicans say they believe in limited government, they only mean that they want a government limited to one controlled by Republicans. They are the party of war, torture, empire, militarism, the warfare state – and the welfare state. That is, the Republican Party stands for everything I oppose. All the talk by Republicans about the Constitution, the free market, and limited government is just a bunch of hot air – as is the Republican Party platform, Republican "Pledge to America," and books by Republican "leaders."

On voting, I believe with whomever said that it "just encourages the bastards." I agree with Noam Chomsky that "if voting could actually change anything, it would be illegal," with Mark Twain that "if voting made a difference, they wouldn’t let us do it," and with Charles Bukowski that "the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don’t have to waste your time voting."
On foreign policy, I believe with Thomas Jefferson that the best foreign policy is "peace, commerce, honest friendship with all nations – entangling alliances with none." U.S. foreign policy is reckless, belligerent, and meddling, and has been for over 100 years.
On war, I believe with Benjamin Franklin that "there was never a good war or a bad peace." I see nothing good about a "good war" (WWII) in which 50 million people died, the majority of whom were civilians. I also like Ike when he said about the atomic bombing of Japan that "it wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing." I believe the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are especially senseless, unjust, and immoral. I agree with Randolph Bourne that "war is the health of the state."
On the U.S. military, I believe that instead of being a "global force for good," it is a global force for evil. Not only should the military not be fighting foreign wars, no U.S. soldier should be stationed anywhere but on American soil. All 1,000 foreign bases should be closed, and all U.S. troops should be brought home. The sooner the better. And to Christians I would add that the U.S. military is not the Lord’s army.

On liberty, I believe, with Leonard Read, that people have the fundamental right to do "anything that’s peaceful" as long as it is not aggressing against someone else’s person or property. I believe, with Lysander Spooner, that vices are not crimes. I subscribe to the libertarian non-aggression principle; that is, it is wrong to threaten or initiate violence against someone unless in defense of one’s person or property.
On abortion, I believe that abortion is not only morally wrong, but violates libertarianism’s non-aggression principle. However, I part company with pro-lifers because I don’t believe the federal government has any more authority to concern itself with abortion than it does to concern itself with the amount of parking ticket fines in the fifty states. And I also extend my pro-life sentiments to children and adults in foreign countries on the receiving end of U.S. bombs and bullets.
On gun control, I believe gun control is being able to hit your target. And unlike some in the NRA, I actually believe that the Second Amendment prohibits the federal government from infringing in any way on the right to keep and bear arms. That is, the federal government has no authority to ban or regulate any gun of any caliber or type, any ammunition, any magazines, any gun sales or purchases, or any gun shows. And the federal government has no authority to set up a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms since it has no authority to ban or regulate alcohol, tobacco, or firearms.
I’m sure I am missing something. But the above, in a large nutshell, is my view of politics that some are uninterested in.
November 5, 2012
Copyright © 2012 by Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

No comments:

Post a Comment